In this study, we have taken advantage of a pulsed CO₂ electroreduction reaction (CO₂RR) approach to tune the product distribution at industrially relevant current densities in a gas-fed flow cell. We compared the CO₂RR selectivity of Cu catalysts subjected to either potentiostatic conditions (fixed applied potential of -0.7 VRHE) or pulsed electrolysis conditions (1 s pulses at oxidative potentials ranging from Ean = 0.6 to 1.5 VRHE, followed by 1 s pulses at -0.7 VRHE) and identified the main parameters responsible for the enhanced product selectivity observed in the latter case. Herein, two distinct regimes were observed: (i) for Ean = 0.9 VRHE we obtained 10% enhanced C₂ product selectivity (FEC₂H₄ = 43.6% and FEC₂H₅OH = 19.8%) in comparison to the potentiostatic CO₂RR at -0.7 VRHE (FEC₂H₄ = 40.9% and FEC₂H₅OH = 11%), (ii) while for Ean = 1.2 VRHE, high CH₄ selectivity (FECH₄ = 48.3% vs 0.1% at constant -0.7 VRHE) was observed. Operando spectroscopy (XAS, SERS) and ex situ microscopy (SEM and TEM) measurements revealed that these differences in catalyst selectivity can be ascribed to structural modifications and local pH effects. The morphological reconstruction of the catalyst observed after pulsed electrolysis with Ean = 0.9 VRHE, including the presence of highly defective interfaces and grain boundaries, was found to play a key role in the enhancement of the C₂ product formation. In turn, pulsed electrolysis with Ean = 1.2 VRHE caused the consumption of OH⁻ species near the catalyst surface, leading to an OH-poor environment favorable for CH₄ production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeon et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: