¹⁸F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-ligand PET has several principal advantages over ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the frequency of non-tumor-related uptake and the detection efficacy comparing ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer (PC) patients. Methods: The study included 102 patients with biochemically recurrent PC after radical prostatectomy undergoing ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT imaging. On the basis of various clinical variables, patients with corresponding ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans were matched. All PET/CT scans (n = 204) were reviewed by 1 nuclear medicine physician. First, all PET-positive lesions were noted. Then, lesions suspected of being recurrent PC were differentiated from lesions attributed to a benign origin on the basis of known pitfalls and information from CT. For each region, the SUVmax of the lesion with the highest PSMA-ligand uptake was noted. Detection rates were determined, and SUVmax was compared separately for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 and ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007. Results: In total, ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET revealed 369 and 178 PSMA-ligand-positive lesions, respectively. ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET revealed approximately 5 times more lesions attributed to a benign origin than did ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET (245 vs. 52 lesions, respectively). The benign lesions most frequently observed were ganglia, unspecific lymph node, and bone lesions, at a rate of 43%, 31%, and 24% for ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET and 29%, 42%, and 27% for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET, respectively. The SUVmax of lesions attributed to a benign origin was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) for ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET. Further, a similar number of lesions was attributed to recurrent PC (124/369 for ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET and 126/178 for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET). Conclusion: The number of lesions with increased PSMA-ligand uptake attributed to a benign origin is considerably higher for ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET than for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET. This finding indicates the need for sophisticated reader training emphasizing known pitfalls and reporting within the clinical context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rauscher et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: