Why the study?
The simplified 1980s framework linking heart rate variability components to autonomic divisions cannot accommodate accumulated evidence, leading to assessment pitfalls.
Design
Review
May mislead clinical HRV interpretation; leaves open validation of revised autonomic models.
Although analysis of heart rate variability is widely used for the assessment of autonomic function, its fundamental framework linking low-frequency and high-frequency components of heart rate variability with sympathetic and parasympathetic autonomic divisions has developed in the 1980s. This simplified framework is no longer able to deal with much evidence about heart rate variability accumulated over the past half-century. This review addresses the pitfalls caused by the old framework and discusses the points that need attention in autonomic assessment by heart rate variability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayano et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: