We compile black hole (BH) masses for ~ 60,000 quasars in the redshift range 0.1 z 4.5 included in the Fifth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), using virial BH mass estimators based on the , , and emission lines. We find that: (1) within our sample, the widths of the three lines follow log-normal distributions, with means and dispersions that do not depend strongly on luminosity or redshift;(2) the - and -estimated BH masses are consistent with one another; and (3) the BH mass estimator may be more severely affected by a disk wind component than the and estimators, giving a positive bias in mass correlated with the - blueshift. Most SDSS quasars have virial BH masses in the range 10⁸-10⁹ M_. There is a clear upper mass limit of ~ 10¹⁰ M_ for active BHs at z 2, decreasing at lower redshifts. Making the reasonable assumptions that the underlying BH mass distribution decreases with mass and that the Eddington ratio distribution at fixed BH mass has non-zero width, we show that the measured virial BH mass distribution and Eddington ratio distribution are subject to Malmquist bias. A radio quasar subsample (with 1.5 z 2.3) has mean virial BH mass larger by ~ 0.12 dex than the whole sample. A broad absorption line (BAL) quasar subsample (with 1.7 z 2.2) has identical virial mass distribution as the nonBAL sample, with no mean offset. (Abridged)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: