Background: Acute variceal bleeding as a cause of upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage is a serious problem that resulting in early death of cirrhotic patients. So, predicting the risk of early re-bleeding and death is crucial for preventing morbidity and mortality. Nowadays , there are multiple scoring systems with good prognostic power have been developed, but there is still a need to find an easier and better scores that can be applied in clinical practice within each population and country. Aim: evaluation of the role of ALBI and PALBI scores as a prognostic tools in cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding. Methodology: cross-sectional prospective study , done on patients admitted to Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Infectious diseases department at Beni-Suef University Hospital in Egypt who complained of acute onset of variceal bleeding. ALBI and PALBI were calculated and correlated with rates of hospital rebreeding and mortality. Results: This study was done on 100 patients. The rates of first attack of bleeding, rebreeding and in-hospital mortality were 43 patients (43%), 37patients (37%) and 20 patients (20%). Age was a significant risk factor for in hospital morbidity and mortality (P= 0.008*) . Hb, WBCs, PLTs, Creatinine, liver enzymes (AST, ALT) and Bilirubin (T, D) had a statically significant relation to re-bleeding. Regarding hospital mortality, ALBI , PALBI and MELD scores have a better prognostic value in prediction of mortality with AUC 0.726, 0.798 and 0.750 respectively. Conclusion: ALBI, PALBI and MELD scores were helpful for prediction of hospital mortality in patients with variceal bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sieddek et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: