Why the study?
Does an automated adaptive analytics algorithm provide accurate and reproducible quantification of left-heart chambers compared to conventional manual methodology?
Does an automated adaptive analytics algorithm provide accurate and reproducible quantification of left-heart chambers compared to conventional manual methodology?
Automated 3D echocardiographic analysis is an accurate and more reproducible alternative to manual methods, potentially facilitating its integration into clinical routine.
May support routine 3DE adoption for reproducibility; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
Automated 3DE analysis of left-heart chambers is an accurate alternative to conventional manual methodology, which yields almost the same values across laboratories and is more reproducible. This technique may contribute towards full integration of 3DE quantification into clinical routine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Medvedofsky et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: