Benefits and Harms of Digital Health Interventions Promoting Physical Activity in People With Chronic Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Figures

• 

  Figure 1. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart of the study selection process.

• 

  Figure 2. Overall forest plot of objectively measured physical activity, objectively measured physical function, and moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at the end of the intervention. Obj PA: objectively measured physical activity; Obj PF: objectively measured physical function.

• 

  Figure 3. Overall forest plot of subjectively measured physical activity, physical function, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at the end of the intervention. Subj PA: subjectively measured physical activity; Subj PF: subjectively measured physical function.

• 

  Figure 4. Overall forest plot of depression and anxiety at the end of the intervention. ANX: anxiety; DEP: depression.

• 

  Figure 5. Overall forest plot of objectively measured physical activity, physical function, and moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at follow-up. Obj PA: objectively measured physical activity; Obj PF: objectively measured physical function.

• 

  Figure 6. Overall forest plot of subjectively measured physical activity, physical function, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at follow-up. Subj PA: subjectively measured physical activity; Subj PF: subjectively measured physical function.

• 

  Figure 7. Overall forest plot of depression and anxiety at follow-up. ANX: anxiety; DEP: depression.

• 

  Figure 8. Risk of bias for objectively measured physical activity given as percentages.

• 

  Figure 9. Risk of bias with objectively measured physical function given as percentages.