PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2017Cancer Research245 citationsOpen Access

Genomic Instability in Cancer: Teetering on the Limit of Tolerance

NANoemi AndorCMCarlo C. MaleyHJHanlee P. Ji

Key Points

  • The research investigates how levels of genomic instability influence the prognosis of epithelial tumors and their response to therapies.
  • Focus on solid tumors of epithelial origin
  • Quantitative assessment of somatic copy number alterations
  • Exploration of the relationship between genomic instability and prognosis
  • Extreme genomic instability (>75% somatic copy number alterations) correlates with better prognosis compared to intermediate instability
  • Evidence suggests high instability may enhance immunogenicity of tumors
  • Potential sensitivity of tumors with high genomic instability to DNA-damaging therapies

Abstract

Cancer genomic instability contributes to the phenomenon of intratumoral genetic heterogeneity, provides the genetic diversity required for natural selection, and enables the extensive phenotypic diversity that is frequently observed among patients. Genomic instability has previously been associated with poor prognosis. However, we have evidence that for solid tumors of epithelial origin, extreme levels of genomic instability, where more than 75% of the genome is subject to somatic copy number alterations, are associated with a potentially better prognosis compared with intermediate levels under this threshold. This has been observed in clonal subpopulations of larger size, especially when genomic instability is shared among a limited number of clones. We hypothesize that cancers with extreme levels of genomic instability may be teetering on the brink of a threshold where so much of their genome is adversely altered that cells rarely replicate successfully. Another possibility is that tumors with high levels of genomic instability are more immunogenic than other cancers with a less extensive burden of genetic aberrations. Regardless of the exact mechanism, but hinging on our ability to quantify how a tumor's burden of genetic aberrations is distributed among coexisting clones, genomic instability has important therapeutic implications. Herein, we explore the possibility that a high genomic instability could be the basis for a tumor's sensitivity to DNA-damaging therapies. We primarily focus on studies of epithelial-derived solid tumors. Cancer Res; 77(9); 2179-85. ©2017 AACR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andor et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7ba3be57cdc1cc9ae297ehttps://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-1553
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Oxidative stress activates a specific p53 transcriptional response that regulates cellular senescence and aging2013 · 153 citations
  2. 2A genome-wide view of Caenorhabditis elegans base-substitution mutation processes2009 · 298 citations
  3. 3DNA Content and Tumor Response to Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma1993 · 24 citations
  4. 4Clinical Outcomes and Correlates of TP53 Mutations and Cancer2009 · 396 citations
  5. 5GiniClust: detecting rare cell types from single-cell gene expression data with Gini index2016 · 360 citations