Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MRI offers excellent visualization of the bone and soft tissue components of spinal tuberculosis and helps to identify disease at distant asymptomatic sites. CT is useful in assessing bone destruction, but is less accurate in defining the epidural extension of the disease and therefore its effect on neural structures. MR imaging clearly demonstrated the extent of soft tissue disease and its effect on the theca/cord and foramen in cases with doubtful CT findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sinan et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: