Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 20, 2006Physical Review BOpen Access

More accurate generalized gradient approximation for solids

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ZWZhigang WuAmes Research CenterRCR. E. CohenCarnegie Institution for Science

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7c88da2a48916bbbed8aehttps://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.73.235116
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparing the weighted density approximation with the LDA and GGA for ground-state properties of ferroelectric perovskites2004 · 157 citations
  2. 2Accurate Density Functional with Correct Formal Properties: A Step Beyond the Generalized Gradient Approximation1999 · 897 citations
  3. 3Tests of a ladder of density functionals for bulk solids and surfaces2004 · 416 citations
  4. 4Jellium surface energy beyond the local-density approximation: Self-consistent-field calculations2001 · 71 citations
  5. 5Comment on “Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple”1998 · 2,966 citations