Discovery is a two-step process—finding and comprehending (see scheme). The history of chemistry contains incorrect attributions, mistakes, and problems created by conflicting interpretations. But retrospective analyses can set matters straight and give credit where credit is due. Language and naming also convey a fascinating human side to research and illustrate that chemical discovery is multifaceted, evolutionary, and very much alive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pedro Cintas (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: