Reliability and Validity of Two Versions of the Upper Extremity Functional Index

Bert M. Chesworth; Clayon B. Hamilton; David M. Walton; Melissa Benoit; Tracy Blake; Heather Bredy; Cameron Burns; Lianne Chan; Elizabeth A. Frey; Graham Gillies; Teresa Gravelle; Rick Ho; Robert L. Holmes; Roland L.J. Lavallée; Melanie MacKinnon; Alishah Merchant; Tammy Sherman; Kelly Spears; Darryl Yardley

doi:10.3138/ptc.2013-45

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Abstract

Both UEFI measures show acceptable reliability and validity. Arm dominance affects pMCID. The UEFI-15 is recommended because it measures only one dimension: UE function.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Chesworth et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7d6c95c3030ff03d17ca7 https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2013-45

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Reliability and Validity of Two Versions of the Upper Extremity Functional Index

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Reliability and Validity of Two Versions of the Upper Extremity Functional Index

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading