Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
ABSTRACT Using newly available materiality classifications of sustainability topics, we develop a novel dataset by hand-mapping sustainability investments classified as material for each industry into firm-specific sustainability ratings. This allows us to present new evidence on the value implications of sustainability investments. Using both calendar-time portfolio stock return regressions and firm-level panel regressions, we find that firms with good ratings on material sustainability issues significantly outperform firms with poor ratings on these issues. In contrast, firms with good ratings on immaterial sustainability issues do not significantly outperform firms with poor ratings on the same issues. These results are confirmed when we analyze future changes in accounting performance. The results have implications for asset managers who have committed to the integration of sustainability factors in their capital allocation decisions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mozaffar Khan
Sustainability Institute
George Serafeim
State Street (United States)
Aaron Yoon
Kellogg's (Canada)
The Accounting Review
Harvard University
University of Minnesota
Harvard University Press
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Khan et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7eabe5c3030ff03d1836e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: