PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2014International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology226 citations

A systematic review of social support in youth sport

View Full Paper
DSDaragh SheridanPCPete CoffeeDLDavid Lavallee

Key Points

  • The review aims to summarize existing research on social support in youth sport between 1990 and 2013.
  • Systematic review of 73 studies published from 1990 to 2013
  • Evaluation of sample characteristics, research designs, and types of social support providers
  • Inclusion of qualitative (23%), quantitative (75%), and mixed-model (2%) designs.
  • Coaches were the most prevalent social support providers, offering tangible, informational, emotional, and esteem support.
  • Positive outcomes include increased athlete motivation levels and elite sport participation.
  • Negative outcomes include athlete drop-out rates due to lack of support.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide a systematic review of studies concerning social support in youth sport from 1990 to 2013. A total of 73 studies were evaluated and are reported in four sections: sample characteristics; research designs; social support provider type; and key correlates relating to social support. Samples ranged from 1 to 564. Studies examined a wide range of sports, ages (10–22 years) and competition levels. Studies used qualitative (23%), quantitative (75%) and mixed-model (2%) designs. The main conclusion is that recent advances in the conceptualization of social support have generated a more diverse set of methods to examine the quantity and satisfaction of social support in a sports context. Coaches were identified as the most prevalent provider of social support through offering participants unique forms of tangible, informational, emotional and esteem support. Furthermore, coach, parent and peer support plays a significant role in shaping youth sport experiences both from a positive (athlete motivation levels, elite sport participation) and negative (drop-out) perspective. The discussion focuses on the current status of the research area, limitations, suggested practical implications (e.g., providing proactive support) and future research directions (e.g., examining optimal support matching).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sheridan et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7ee0d5c3030ff03d184dehttps://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2014.931999
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Development and Preliminary Validation of an Athlete Burnout Measure2001 · 989 citations
  2. 2Developing Talent in Young People1985 · 1,529 citations
  3. 3Peer-Created Motivational Climate2007 · 54 citations
  4. 4Career transitions in sport2003 · 61 citations
  5. 5Parent and sport socialization: views from the achievement literature.1993 · 105 citations