April 4, 2011New England Journal of Medicine
Percutaneous Repair or Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
Why the study?
Does percutaneous repair improve safety and clinical outcomes compared to conventional surgery in patients with mitral regurgitation?
Population
Patients with mitral regurgitation
Comparison
Percutaneous repair vs Conventional surgery
Design
RCT
Authors
Discussion
Loading...
Member takes
Implication
Positions percutaneous repair as a safer option with comparable outcomes; extends evidence for less invasive mitral interventions.
Structured PICO
Does percutaneous repair improve safety and clinical outcomes compared to conventional surgery in patients with mitral regurgitation?
P
Population
Patients with mitral regurgitation
I
Intervention
Percutaneous repair
C
Comparator
Conventional surgery
O
Outcome
Reduction of mitral regurgitation, safety, and clinical outcomes
Percutaneous mitral valve repair provides superior safety and similar clinical outcomes compared to conventional surgery, despite being less effective at reducing mitral regurgitation.
Cite This Study
Feldman et al. (2011) studied this question.