PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2009General Physiology and Biophysics446 citationsOpen Access

Structure and flexibility within proteins as identified through small angle X-ray scattering

MPMartin PelikánGHGreg L. HuraMHMichal Hammel

Key Points

  • Develop and validate an analytical pipeline combining small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and molecular dynamics simulations to determine protein domain flexibility and solution conformations.
  • Explored conformational space using molecular dynamics simulations of flexible domain connections at elevated kinetic temperatures (BILBOMD).
  • Calculated theoretical SAXS profiles from simulated conformers and identified the best-fitting minimal ensemble using a genetic algorithm (minimal ensemble search, MES).
  • Evaluated the modeling strategy on synthetic protein models and four experimental protein systems.
  • High-temperature molecular dynamics simulations prevented conformers from becoming trapped in local energy minima, providing broad conformational ensembles.
  • The minimal ensemble search successfully identified the smallest subset of solution conformations required to fit experimental SAXS curves across all four experimental protein test cases.

Abstract

Flexibility between domains of proteins is often critical for function. These motions and proteins with large scale flexibility in general are often not readily amenable to conventional structural analysis such as X-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) or electron microscopy. A common evolution of a crystallography project, once a high resolution structure has been determined, is to postulate possible sights of flexibility. Here we describe an analysis tool using relatively inexpensive small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements to identify flexibility and validate a constructed minimal ensemble of models, which represent highly populated conformations in solution. The resolution of these results is sufficient to address the questions being asked: what kinds of conformations do the domains sample in solution? In our rigid body modeling strategy BILBOMD, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are used to explore conformational space. A common strategy is to perform the MD simulation on the domains connections at very high temperature, where the additional kinetic energy prevents the molecule from becoming trapped in a local minimum. The MD simulations provide an ensemble of molecular models from which a SAXS curve is calculated and compared to the experimental curve. A genetic algorithm is used to identify the minimal ensemble (minimal ensemble search, MES) required to best fit the experimental data. We demonstrate the use of MES in several model and in four experimental examples.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pelikán et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7ef985c3030ff03d186abhttps://doi.org/10.4149/gpb_2009_02_174
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1CHARMM : A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations1983 · 14,984 citations
  2. 2Flavors of protein disorder2003 · 386 citations
  3. 3Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems1992 · 35,570 citations
  4. 4CRYSOL– a Program to Evaluate X-ray Solution Scattering of Biological Macromolecules from Atomic Coordinates1995 · 3,514 citations
  5. 5Genetic Algorithms in Search1989 · 10,071 citations