Why the study?
Does one-off DASH-based dietary counselling improve blood pressure, lipid profile, and BMI in Chinese patients newly diagnosed with Grade 1 hypertension?
Does one-off DASH-based dietary counselling improve blood pressure, lipid profile, and BMI in Chinese patients newly diagnosed with Grade 1 hypertension?
A one-off DASH dietary counselling session in primary care does not provide additional long-term benefits for cardiovascular risk factor reduction compared to standard physician care.
One-off DASH counselling adds no long-term BP benefit over standard care; challenges single-session dietary advice and supports trials of sustained interventions.
To evaluate the effectiveness of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) by one-off dietary counselling on reducing cardiovascular risk factors among Chinese Grade 1 hypertensive patients in primary care. A parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (ChiCTR-TRC-13003014) was conducted among patients (40–70 years old) newly diagnosed with Grade 1 hypertension in primary care settings in Hong Kong. Subjects were randomized to usual care (standard education, control) (n = 275), or usual care plus DASH-based dietary counselling (intervention) (n = 281). The study endpoints included blood pressure (BP), lipid profile, and body mass index (BMI) at 6- and 12-months. Outcome data were available for 504 (90.6%) and 485 (87.2%) patients at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Blood pressure levels reduced in both groups at follow-ups. However, the intervention group did not show a significantly greater reduction in either systolic BP (−0.7 mmHg, 95%CI −3.0–1.5 at 6-month; −0.1 mmHg, 95%CI −2.4–2.2 at 12-month) or diastolic BP (−1.0 mmHg, 95%CI −2.7–0.7 at 6-month; −1.1 mmHg, 95%CI −2.9–0.6 at 12-month), when compared with the control group. The improvements in lipid profile and BMI were observed among all subjects, yet no significant differences were detected between intervention and control groups. The DASH diet by one-off dietitian counselling which resembled the common primary care practice might confer no added long-term benefits on top of physician's usual care in optimizing cardiovascular risk factors. Physicians may still practice standard usual care, yet further explorations on different DASH delivery models are warranted to inform best clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wong et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: