Why the study?
Practice guidelines typically provide drug doses for patients with normal body habitus rather than morbid obesity, potentially leading to treatment failure or toxicity.
How should medications for hemodynamic support and prophylaxis be dosed in critically ill obese patients?
How should medications for hemodynamic support and prophylaxis be dosed in critically ill obese patients?
This review provides guidance on adjusting drug doses for hemodynamic support and prophylaxis in critically ill obese patients, highlighting the need for higher doses of VTE prophylaxis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support standard dosing for hemodynamic and stress ulcer prophylaxis agents in obese ICU patients; leaves open optimal VTE strategies pending prospective data.
Medications used for supportive care or prophylaxis constitute a significant portion of drug utilization in the intensive care unit. Evidence-based guidelines are available for many aspects of supportive care but drug doses listed are typically for patients with normal body habitus and not morbid obesity. Failure to account for the pharmacokinetic changes that occur with obesity can lead to an incorrect dose and treatment failure or toxicity. This paper is intended to help clinicians design initial dosing regimens in critically ill obese patients for medications commonly used for hemodynamic support or prophylaxis. A detailed literature search of medications used for supportive care or prophylaxis listed in practice guidelines was conducted with an emphasis on obesity, pharmacokinetics and dosing. Relevant manuscripts were reviewed and strategies for dosing are provided. For medications used for hemodynamic support, a similar strategy can be used as in non-obese patients. Similarly, medications for stress ulcer prophylaxis do not need to be adjusted. Anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, on the other hand, require an individualized approach where higher doses are necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erstad et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: