PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 24, 2016Journal of Medical Screening49 citationsOpen Access

Patient factors associated with non-attendance at colonoscopy after a positive screening faecal occult blood test

APAndrew PlumbAGAlex GhanouniSRSandra Rainbow

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background Screening participants with abnormal faecal occult blood test results who do not attend further testing are at high risk of colorectal cancer, yet little is known about their reasons for non-attendance. Methods We conducted a medical record review of 170 patients from two English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme centres who had abnormal guaiac faecal occult blood test screening tests between November 2011 and April 2013 but did not undergo colonoscopy. Using information from patient records, we coded and categorized reasons for non-attendance. Results Of the 170 patients, 82 were eligible for review, of whom 66 had at least one recorded reason for lack of colonoscopy follow-up. Reasons fell into seven main categories: (i) other commitments, (ii) unwillingness to have the test, (iii) a feeling that the faecal occult blood test result was a false positive, (iv) another health issue taking priority, (v) failing to complete bowel preparation, (vi) practical barriers (e.g. lack of transport), and (vii) having had or planning colonoscopy elsewhere. The most common single reasons were unwillingness to have a colonoscopy and being away. Conclusions We identify a range of apparent reasons for colonoscopy non-attendance after a positive faecal occult blood test screening. Education regarding the interpretation of guaiac faecal occult blood test findings, offer of alternative confirmatory test options, and flexibility in the timing or location of subsequent testing might decrease non-attendance of diagnostic testing following positive faecal occult blood test.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Plumb et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d807053eff0c9dfaae30e1https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141316645629
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test1996 · 2,507 citations
  2. 2The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in England2007 · 195 citations
  3. 3Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy2005 · 290 citations
  4. 4Reasons for Participation and Nonparticipation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Trial of Colonoscopy and CT Colonography2012 · 57 citations
  5. 5Using thematic analysis in psychology2006 · 192,304 citations