PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 12, 2020Nature Sustainability166 citationsOpen Access

A scoping review of market links between value chain actors and small-scale producers in developing regions

LLLenis Saweda O. Liverpool‐TasieAWAyala WinemanSYSarah Young

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Sustainable Development Goal 2 aims to end hunger, achieve food and nutrition security and promote sustainable agriculture by 2030. This requires that small-scale producers be included in, and benefit from, the rapid growth and transformation under way in food systems. Small-scale producers interact with various actors when they link with markets, including product traders, logistics firms, processors and retailers. The literature has explored primarily how large firms interact with farmers through formal contracts and resource provision arrangements. Although important, contracts constitute a very small share of smallholder market interactions. There has been little exploration of whether non-contract interactions between small farmers and both small- and large-scale value chain actors have affected small farmers’ livelihoods. This scoping review covers 202 studies on that topic. We find that non-contract interactions, de facto mostly with small and medium enterprises, benefit small-scale producers via similar mechanisms that the literature has previously credited to large firms. Small and medium enterprises, not just large enterprises, address idiosyncratic market failures and asset shortfalls of small-scale producers by providing them, through informal arrangements, with complementary services such as input provision, credit, information and logistics. Providing these services directly supports Sustainable Development Goal 2 by improving farmer welfare through technology adoption and greater productivity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liverpool‐Tasie et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d81cbc7392c8ce61bee8d9https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00621-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rural market imperfections and the role of institutions in collective action to improve markets for the poor2008 · 108 citations
  2. 2RATIONING, SPILLOVER, AND INTERLINKING IN CREDIT MARKETS: THE CASE OF RURAL PUNJAB1997 · 174 citations
  3. 3The Rise of a Middle Class in East and Southern Africa: Implications for Food System Transformation2015 · 281 citations
  4. 4SUPPORTING SMALLHOLDER COMMERCIALISATION BY ENHANCING INTEGRATED COORDINATION IN AGRIFOOD VALUE CHAINS: EXPERIENCES WITH DAIRY HUBS IN KENYA2016 · 91 citations
  5. 5Tradeoffs or Synergies? Assessing Local and Regional Food Aid Procurement through Case Studies in Burkina Faso and Guatemala2013 · 25 citations