Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study demonstrated that although the Isiolo County has been classified as being at medium risk for RVF, virus infection appeared to be as prevalent in humans as in Tana River and Garissa, which have been classified as being at high risk. Populations in these counties live within nomadic livestock movement routes and therefore at risk of being exposed to the RVFV. Interventions to control RVFV infections therefore, should target communities living along livestock movement pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tigoi et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: