PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 26, 1997Science4,800 citations

Nanobeam Mechanics: Elasticity, Strength, and Toughness of Nanorods and Nanotubes

View Full Paper
EWEric W. M. WongPSPaul E. SheehanCLCharles M. Lieber

Key Points

  • To directly measure and compare the mechanical properties—including Young's modulus, strength, and toughness—of individual silicon carbide nanorods and multiwall carbon nanotubes.
  • Mounted structurally isolated silicon carbide (SiC) nanorods and multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) by pinning one end to molybdenum disulfide surfaces.
  • Applied atomic force microscopy (AFM) to measure bending force versus displacement along the unpinned lengths of the nanostructures.
  • Multiwall carbon nanotubes were approximately two times stiffer than silicon carbide nanorods.
  • Silicon carbide nanorods fractured under continued bending, exhibiting strengths substantially greater than larger SiC structures and approaching theoretical limits.
  • Multiwall carbon nanotubes underwent an elastic buckling process under severe bending, resulting in lower ultimate strength than SiC nanorods but demonstrating exceptional toughness and energy absorption.

Abstract

The Young's modulus, strength, and toughness of nanostructures are important to proposed applications ranging from nanocomposites to probe microscopy, yet there is little direct knowledge of these key mechanical properties. Atomic force microscopy was used to determine the mechanical properties of individual, structurally isolated silicon carbide (SiC) nanorods (NRs) and multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) that were pinned at one end to molybdenum disulfide surfaces. The bending force was measured versus displacement along the unpinned lengths. The MWNTs were about two times as stiff as the SiC NRs. Continued bending of the SiC NRs ultimately led to fracture, whereas the MWNTs exhibited an interesting elastic buckling process. The strengths of the SiC NRs were substantially greater than those found previously for larger SiC structures, and they approach theoretical values. Because of buckling, the ultimate strengths of the stiffer MWNTs were less than those of the SiC NRs, although the MWNTs represent a uniquely tough, energy-absorbing material.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wong et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d832e93eff0c9dfaae38achttps://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5334.1971
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper