Design
Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights the physiological origins of false positives and false negatives in fNIRS studies and suggests ways to avoid and remove them.
We highlight a significant problem that needs to be considered and addressed when performing functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies, namely the possibility of inadvertently measuring fNIRS hemodynamic responses that are not due to neurovascular coupling. These can be misinterpreted as brain activity, i.e., "false positives" (errors caused by wrongly assigning a detected hemodynamic response to functional brain activity), or mask brain activity, i.e., "false negatives" (errors caused by wrongly assigning a not observed hemodynamic response in the presence of functional brain activity). Here, we summarize the possible physiological origins of these issues and suggest ways to avoid and remove them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tachtsidis et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: