PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2018Research in Organizational Behavior311 citationsOpen Access

The recovery paradox: Portraying the complex interplay between job stressors, lack of recovery, and poor well-being

View Full Paper
SSSabine Sonnentag

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Job stressors such as time pressure, organizational constraints, and interpersonal conflicts matter for individual well-being within organizations, both at the day level and over longer periods of time. Recovery-enhancing processes such as psychological detachment from work during nonwork time, physical exercise, and sleep have the potential to protect well-being. Although the experience of job stressors calls for effective recovery processes, empirical research shows that recovery processes actually are impaired when job stressors are high (recovery paradox). This article presents explanations for the recovery paradox, discusses moderating factors, and suggests avenues for future research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sabine Sonnentag (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d835fb617ce96c42ae32f4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Chronic job burnout and daily functioning: A theoretical analysis2014 · 469 citations
  2. 2Recovery experiences as moderators between psychosocial work characteristics and occupational well-being2009 · 240 citations
  3. 3The power of presence: The role of mindfulness at work for daily levels and change trajectories of psychological detachment and sleep quality.2014 · 283 citations
  4. 4Cognitive and Affective Job Insecurity: A Meta-Analysis and a Primary Study2018 · 419 citations
  5. 5Job Insecurity: An Integrative Review and Agenda for Future Research2017 · 804 citations