Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The increasing diversity of methods used to process and score accelerometer data for youth precludes comparison of results across studies. Decision rule reporting is inconsistent, and trends indicate declining standardization of methods. A methodological research agenda and consensus process are proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cain et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: