High polymer tunneling resistivity ( ρ ) enhances tunneling resistance, thereby restricting electron transferring in nanocomposites; however, ρ remains an ambiguous parameter. In this work, two developed models for electrical conductivity of carbon nanofiber (CNF) polymer samples (PCNFs) are integrated to express ρ by CNF characteristics (concentration, conductivity, percolation threshold, size and waviness), interphase depth, network fraction, and tunneling dimensions (length and diameter). Extensive experimental data are used to validate the models. Furthermore, ρ is calculated for several samples from prior studies. The effects of various factors on ρ are analyzed to confirm the validity of the proposed equation. The resulting patterns elucidate the key parameters governing ρ in PCNFs. A lower percolation threshold, thicker interphase, higher network fraction, greater CNF conductivity, along with shorter and wider tunnels, lead to reduced ρ . The maximum ρ , recorded at 1600 Ω m, occurs at a CNF radius ( R ) = 100 nm and CNF length ( l ) = 40 μm, while R < 70 nm or l > 80 μm decreases ρ to 87 Ω m. Thus, thinner or longer nanofibers substantially reduce the ρ improving the charge transferring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zare et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: