Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Very recently, the first mathematical runtime analyses of the multiobjective evolutionary optimizer nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) have been conducted. We continue this line of research with a first runtime analysis of this algorithm on a benchmark problem consisting of multimodal objectives. We prove that if the population size <tex-math notation="LaTeX">N </tex-math> is at least four times the size of the Pareto front, then the NSGA-II with four standard ways to select parents, bitwise mutation, and crossover with rate less than one, optimizes the OneJumpZeroJump benchmark with jump size <tex-math notation="LaTeX">2 ≤ k ≤ n/4 </tex-math> in time <tex-math notation="LaTeX">O(N nᵏ) </tex-math> . When using fast mutation instead of bitwise mutation this guarantee improves by a factor of <tex-math notation="LaTeX">kΩ (k) </tex-math> . Overall, this work shows that the NSGA-II copes with the local optima of the OneJumpZeroJump problem at least as well as the global SEMO algorithm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doerr et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: