PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2013CBE—Life Sciences Education578 citationsOpen Access

The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A New Instrument to Characterize University STEM Classroom Practices

View Full Paper
MSMichelle K. SmithFJFrancis JonesSGSarah L. Gilbert

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Instructors and the teaching practices they employ play a critical role in improving student learning in college science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses. Consequently, there is increasing interest in collecting information on the range and frequency of teaching practices at department-wide and institution-wide scales. To help facilitate this process, we present a new classroom observation protocol known as the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM or COPUS. This protocol allows STEM faculty, after a short 1.5-hour training period, to reliably characterize how faculty and students are spending their time in the classroom. We present the protocol, discuss how it differs from existing classroom observation protocols, and describe the process by which it was developed and validated. We also discuss how the observation data can be used to guide individual and institutional change.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Smith et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d849cfd56ca42147d182f6https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering2012 · 683 citations
  2. 2Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research2004 · 7,217 citations
  3. 3Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction2010 · 421 citations
  4. 4Teaching More by Lecturing Less2005 · 874 citations
  5. 5Letter to the Editor 52010 · 10 citations