PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 21, 2014American Law and Economics Review129 citations

Estimating Gender Disparities in Federal Criminal Cases

View Full Paper
SSSonja B. Starr

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This paper assesses and decomposes gender disparities in federal criminal cases. It finds large unexplained gaps favoring women throughout the sentence length distribution, conditional on arrest offense, criminal history, and other pre-charge observables. Decompositions show that most of the unexplained disparity appears to emerge during charging, plea-bargaining, and sentencing fact-finding. The approach provides an important complement to prior disparity studies, which have focused on sentencing and have not incorporated disparities arising from those earlier stages. I also consider various plausible causal theories that could explain the estimated gender gap, using the rich dataset to test their implications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sonja B. Starr (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d84d205c3030ff03d19c2dhttps://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahu010
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Federal Judicial Center's 1996 Survey of Guideline Experience1996 · 10 citations
  2. 2Statistics and Causal Inference1986 · 5,157 citations
  3. 3THE IMPACT OF THE ETHNICITY AND GENDER OF DEFENDANTS ON THE DECISION TO REJECT OR DISMISS FELONY CHARGES*1987 · 159 citations
  4. 4Labor Market Institutions and the Distribution of Wages, 1973-1992: A Semiparametric Approach1996 · 2,960 citations
  5. 5Privilege or Punish: Criminal Justice and the Challenge of Family Ties2009 · 16 citations