The SAFT-γ Mie group-contribution equation of state [ Papaioannou J. Chem. Phys. 2014 , 140 , 054107 ] is used to develop a transferable coarse-grained (CG) force-field suitable for the molecular simulation of linear alkanes. A heterogroup model is fashioned at the resolution of three carbon atoms per bead in which different Mie (generalized Lennard-Jones) interactions are used to characterize the terminal (CH₃-CH₂-CH₂-) and middle (-CH₂-CH₂-CH₂-) beads. The force field is developed by combining the SAFT-γ CG top-down approach [ Avendaño J. Phys. Chem. B 2011 , 115 , 11154 ], using experimental phase-equilibrium data for n-alkanes ranging from n-nonane to n-pentadecane to parametrize the intermolecular (nonbonded) bead-bead interactions, with a bottom-up approach relying on simulations based on the higher resolution TraPPE united-atom (UA) model [ Martin ; , Siepmann J. Phys. Chem. B 1998 , 102 , 2569 ] to establish the intramolecular (bonded) interactions. The transferability of the SAFT-γ CG model is assessed from a detailed examination of the properties of linear alkanes ranging from n-hexane ( n-C₆H₁₄) to n-octadecane ( n-C₁₈H₃₈), including an additional evaluation of the reliability of the description for longer chains such as n-hexacontane ( n-C₆₀H₁₂₂) and a prototypical linear polyethylene of moderate molecular weight ( n-C₉₀₀H₁₈₀₂). A variety of structural, thermodynamic, and transport properties are examined, including the pair distribution functions, vapor-liquid equilibria, interfacial tension, viscosity, and diffusivity. Particular focus is placed on the impact of incorporating intramolecular interactions on the accuracy, transferability, and representability of the CG model. The novel SAFT-γ CG force field is shown to provide a reliable description of the thermophysical properties of the n-alkanes, in most cases at a level comparable to the that obtained with higher resolution models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahman et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: