Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Here, we have fabricated of LaPO4:Eu3+ doped and LaPO4/Eu2O3 core-shell nanocrystals using solution based methods. The morphologies, structure, formation mechanism, and photoluminescence properties of these nanocrystals are investigated in detail. The compressive and tensile lattice strains are obtained for hexagonal and monoclinic LaPO4 nanocrystals, respectively. Photoluminescence properties are found to be sensitive to the crystal phase, morphology, and core-shell structures. Judd–Ofelt parameters (Ω2) are calculated to understand the asymmetric nature of the dopant Eu3+ ion in LaPO4 nanocrystals host of various morphologies and crystal phases. It is seen that Ω2 value for nanorod (4.4×10−20 cm2) is higher than the nanoparticles (3.38×10−20 cm2). The quantum yield values increases from 28.27% to 52.4% by changing the crystal phase from hexagonal to monoclinic. The quantum yield of nanorods (58.50%) is higher than nanoparticles (28.68%).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghosh et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: