Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper hypothesizes that tight financial controls associated with large diversified M‐form firms lead to a short‐term, low‐risk orientation and thereby lower relative investment in R&D. Further, it is hypothesized that increasing levels of diversification require different control systems which have significant implications for investing in R&D. Results of the study of 124 major U.S. firms suggest that less diversified U‐form firms invest more heavily in R&D than more diversified M‐form firms after controlling for size and industry effects. Additionally, dominant business firms invested more in R&D than either related or unrelated business firms. Finally, the relationship between R&D intensity and market performance was negative for related and unrelated firms. The findings suggest that the market evaluates R&D investment more positively for firms that are organized to seek synergy than for those that are organized to pursue a hedging (or diversification) strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoskisson et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: