This paper argues that standard dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models grossly overestimate the impact of forward guidance on the macroeconomy, a phenomenon we call the “forward guidance puzzle.” Using data from a panel of Blue Chip survey expectations, we show that accommodative forward guidance had effects on output and inflation expectations that were positive and nontrivial, but still 28 and 8 times smaller, respectively, than implied by standard models. We show that incorporating a perpetual youth structure into the benchmark provides one possible resolution to the puzzle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Negro et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: