PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Drug Discoveries & Therapeutics0 citationsOpen Access

Cytoderm metabolic-labeling SCMLP-TB for pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis: a preliminary diagnostic accuracy study

GLGuangyan LiangGDGuiqin DaiXHXueping Hu

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the novel SCMLP-TB probe for pulmonary tuberculosis.
  • Conducted a retrospective study of 70 suspected TB patients.
  • Calculated sensitivity and specificity of SCMLP-TB against culture and Xpert MTB/RIF.
  • Classified participants into confirmed TB, clinically diagnosed TB, or non-TB cases.
  • Used final clinical diagnosis as a reference standard.
  • Achieved overall sensitivity of 97.5% and specificity of 96.7% for SCMLP-TB.
  • Identified 10 clinically diagnosed TB cases missed by culture and Xpert.
  • Showed sensitivity of culture and Xpert as 62.5% and 72.5% respectively, both with 100% specificity.
  • Found significant higher fluorescence intensity in TB patients compared to non-TB patients.

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant global health issue. Early diagnosis is crucial, yet current diagnostic technologies are limited by suboptimal sensitivity. Thus, we developed a novel tuberculosis metabolic labeling probe (single cell metabolic labeling probe for tuberculosis, SCMLP-TB) and evaluated its diagnostic performance. In this retrospective study of 70 suspected TB patients, we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of SCMLP-TB and compared it with culture and Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) using the final clinical diagnosis as reference standard. Eligible participants were classified as confirmed TB (CT), clinically diagnosed TB (CDxT), or non-TB cases based on the diagnosis criteria for pulmonary tuberculosis (WS 288-2017). Of the 70 participants, 40 (57.0%) were diagnosed with TB, including 30 CT cases and 10 CDxT cases. The overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of SCMLP-TB were 97.5% and 96.7%, respectively. Notably, SCMLP-TB identified 10 CDxT cases missed by both culture and Xpert. The overall diagnostic sensitivity of culture and Xpert was 62.5% and 72.5%, respectively, while both showed a specificity of 100.0%, demonstrating that SCMLP-TB was more sensitive than culture and Xpert. Besides, the fluorescence intensity from TB patients was significantly higher than non-TB patients. The fluorescence intensity showed a significant negative correlation with the time to positivity (TTP) of culture, which suggested that SCMLP-TB could also serve as an indicator of bacterial loads in patients' samples. Consequently, SCMLP-TB demonstrated a promising tool for the sensitive and ultra-fast diagnosis of pulmonary TB suspects, particularly for paucibacillary pulmonary TB.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d892d16c1944d70ce04025https://doi.org/10.5582/ddt.2025.01123
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper