Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exploratory study demonstrates efficacy and tolerability of oral vinorelbine in elderly patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, suggesting a potential new treatment option.
This exploratory study aimed to describe the clinical activity and tolerability profile of oral low-dose metronomic vinorelbine in a real-world cohort of elderly patients with pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Elderly metastatic TNBC patients received oral vinorelbine 20 mg thrice a week until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR; CR + PR + SD for ≥ 6 months). The secondary endpoints were tolerability, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors. 37 patients with elderly metastatic TNBC were enrolled, with a median of 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC. Median age was 69 years (95% Confdence Interval (CI) 48.6–63.1). Number of metastases ≥ 2 in 26 patients (70.3%). The ORR was 29.7%, the DCR was 70.3%, the CBR was 45.9%, the median PFS was 8 months and the median OS was 29 months. The most common adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia (45.9%), anaemia(43.2%), nausea/vomiting(40.5%), and diarrhea (10%), the grade 3/4 AEs were less.The COX multivariate analysis results showed that efficacy of metronomic chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors affecting the survival of patients (P < 0.05). Oral metronomic vinorelbine may represent a potential therapeutic option for elderly metastatic TNBC patients, demonstrating promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile in this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: