Reports the oxidation state of Cu(III) complexes in a copper periodate complex, suggesting a need for boundary recognition in electronic states.
Debate over the electronic structure of CuIII complexes has intensified in recent years, focusing primarily on whether the [Cu(CF₃)₄]⁻ moiety should be described as a classical Werner-type 3d⁸ CuIII complex or as a 3d¹⁰ CuI inverted ligand field framework. The copper periodate complex [Cu(HIO₆)₂]⁵⁻, discovered in 1937, has long been regarded as a 3d⁸ CuIII species and sometimes used as a reference 3d⁸ CuIII complex in oxidation state assignments for Cu-containing metalloenzymes. Nevertheless, its detailed electronic structure remains unexplored. Herein, we revisit the oxidation state of [Cu(HIO₆)₂]⁵⁻ by means of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and density functional theory calculations. The obtained results show that the oxidation state of the Cu center in [Cu(HIO₆)₂]⁵⁻ lies at the boundary between the classical Werner-type and inverted ligand field regimes. This study thus demonstrates that categorizing the oxidation state of CuIII complexes as either 3d⁸ or 3d¹⁰ configurations is often inadequate; instead, the existence of electronic states at the boundary between these two limiting cases should be recognized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takeyama et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: