Key result
Body fat percentage identifies obesity phenotypes missed by BMI, especially in older adults.
Why the study?
Body fat percentage thresholds reflecting adiposity-defined obesity remain limited by sex and age in Asian populations, including Korean adults.
Does adiposity-defined obesity classification identify phenotypes missed by BMI, and what are the corresponding body fat percentage thresholds in Korean adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=18,254)
Does adiposity-defined obesity classification identify phenotypes missed by BMI, and what are the corresponding body fat percentage thresholds in Korean adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adiposity-defined obesity criteria identify individuals missed by BMI alone, particularly older women, and provide specific body fat percentage thresholds for Korean adults.
AIMS: The revised Lancet Commission framework prioritizes excess adiposity over body mass index (BMI) alone for diagnosing obesity, emphasizing population-specific body fat assessments. However, body fat percentage (BFP) thresholds reflecting adiposity-defined obesity remain limited, particularly by sex and age in Asian populations. This study aims to compare BMI- and adiposity-defined obesity classifications and derive sex- and age-specific BFP thresholds in Korean adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 18 254 adults who underwent routine health examinations were analysed, with BFP assessed using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. Adiposity-defined obesity was classified per Lancet Commission criteria using waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio and BMI. BFP thresholds were derived from logistic regression as the values at which the predicted probability of metabolic syndrome matched its observed prevalence among individuals with adiposity-defined obesity. Confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap. RESULTS: Adiposity-defined obesity was more prevalent than BMI-defined obesity, with discordance increasing with age, particularly among women. Overall, 6.6% were classified as obese solely by adiposity-based criteria, rising to 11.1% in men and 15.8% in women aged ≥ 65 years. Overall BFP thresholds were 27.8% (95% CI, 27.4%-28.2%) for men and 39.5% (38.9%-40.2%) for women, with minimal age variation in men but reaching 41.0% (38.8%-43.9%) among women aged ≥ 65 years. CONCLUSIONS: Adiposity-defined obesity identifies phenotypes missed by BMI, particularly in older adults. BFP thresholds derived from adiposity-defined obesity vary substantially by sex and age. These findings support adiposity-centred diagnostic approaches and provide sex- and age-specific BFP thresholds for Korean adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Obesity (n=18,254). Adiposity-defined obesity (Lancet Commission criteria) vs. BMI-defined obesity was evaluated on Body fat percentage (BFP) thresholds matching metabolic syndrome prevalence. Adiposity-defined obesity identified phenotypes missed by BMI, yielding body fat percentage thresholds of 27.8% for men and 39.5% for women.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: