PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Antibiotics0 citationsOpen Access

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftobiprole and Comparator Agents Against Streptococcus pneumoniae Responsible for Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in the United States (2016–2020), Including Resistant Subsets and Select Serotypes

View Full Paper
HSHelio S. SaderJMI LaboratoriesMCMariana CastanheiraJMI LaboratoriesMJMark JonesBasilea Pharmaceutica (Switzerland)

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the in vitro antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole against S. pneumoniae responsible for lower respiratory tract infections.
  • Evaluated ceftobiprole and comparator agents against 2793 S. pneumoniae isolates.
  • Conducted across 32 US sites from 2016 to 2020.
  • Included analysis of geographic regions, resistance phenotypes, and prevalent serotypes.
  • Ceftobiprole inhibited 99.5% of S. pneumoniae at a MIC of ≤0.5 mg/L.
  • Susceptibility rates for ceftobiprole ranged from 98.2% to 100% across surveyed years and regions.
  • Ceftobiprole remained effective against isolates resistant to other antibiotics, including macrolides and tetracycline.

Abstract

Background: Ceftobiprole is an advanced-generation cephalosporin approved in Europe in 2013 for various indications, and in the United States (US) in 2024 for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, and Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, including right-sided endocarditis. Methods: The in vitro activity of ceftobiprole and comparators was evaluated against 2793 Streptococcus pneumoniae causing lower respiratory tract infections in 32 US sites (2016–2020), including against subsets from various geographic regions, resistance phenotypes and prevalent serotypes. Results: Ceftobiprole inhibited 99.5% of all S. pneumoniae at the MIC of ≤0.5 mg/L (MIC50/90, 0.015/0.25 mg/L). Susceptibilities of 98.2% to 100% were observed for ceftobiprole against isolates originating from each surveyed year or each US Census Division. Ceftobiprole retained activity against isolates resistant to macrolides (98.8%), tetracycline (98.2%), oral penicillin (95.4%), against multidrug-resistant isolates (97.0%), and various serotypes (93.8–100%). Ceftriaxone (97.4%) and amoxicillin–clavulanate (95.1%) also showed elevated susceptibilities overall, but inconsistent results and lower than those observed for ceftobiprole were noted against isolates with elevated penicillin MIC or specific serotypes (i.e., 19A). Conclusions: These in vitro results, coupled with documented clinical efficacy, indicate that ceftobiprole is a valuable option to treat CABP caused by S. pneumoniae in the US.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sader et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d894ce6c1944d70ce05bcchttps://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15040375
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper