PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology0 citations

Replacing Cobalt With a CoCrFeNiAl 0.3 High‐Entropy Alloy Binder in WC Cermets: Toward Enhanced Wear Resistance

View Full Paper
SMSedigheh MontazerIsfahan University of TechnologyMHMorteza HadiIsfahan University of TechnologyHPHadi PirjamaliIsfahan University of Technology

Key Points

  • Investigate the potential of a CoCrFeNiAl high-entropy alloy as a binder in WC cermets to enhance wear resistance and performance.
  • Fabricated WC–Co and WC–HEA cermets using spark plasma sintering.
  • Evaluated relative densities and microstructural properties.
  • Conducted hardness, wear resistance, and friction tests.
  • WC–HEA exhibited higher hardness (1751 HV) compared to WC–Co (1346 HV).
  • Significant wear resistance improvement with mass loss of 0.0041 g for WC–HEA vs. 0.0147 g for WC–Co.
  • WC–HEA showed a lower coefficient of friction (0.4998 average) compared to 0.5446 for WC–Co.
  • Moderate decrease in fracture toughness (10.34 MPa·m½ for WC–HEA vs. 11.53 MPa·m½ for WC–Co).

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the replacement of cobalt with a CoCrFeNiAl 0 . 3 high‐entropy alloy (HEA) binder in WC cermets fabricated via spark plasma sintering (SPS). Both WC–Co and WC–HEA cermets achieved near‐full densification, with relative densities of 99.78% and 99.84%, respectively. The WC–HEA composite exhibited a significant increase in hardness (1751 HV vs. 1346 HV, ∼30% higher) and demonstrated superior wear resistance after a 1000 m sliding test, with a mass loss of only 0.0041 g compared to 0.0147 g for WC–Co (over 70% reduction). Additionally, the WC–HEA cermet showed a lower and more stable coefficient of friction (average 0.4998 vs. 0.5446, ∼8% lower) and generated less oxide‐rich debris, indicating enhanced oxidation resistance during sliding. However, a moderate decrease in fracture toughness was observed (10.34 MPa·m½ for WC–HEA vs. 11.53 MPa·m½ for WC–Co). Microstructural analyses revealed that the HEA binder formed a multiphase structure containing W‐rich solid solution and Cr–Fe carbides, contributing to hardness and wear improvements. These findings demonstrate that HEA binders provide a promising alternative to conventional monolithic cobalt binders, offering superior tribological and mechanical performance, albeit with a trade‐off in toughness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Montazer et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d894ec6c1944d70ce05db8https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.70174
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Design of Cobalt-Free High-Entropy Alloy Binder for WC-Base Cemented Carbides2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2WC-based cemented carbide with NiFeCrWMo high-entropy alloy binder as an alternative to cobalt2024 · 11 citations
  3. 3High‐Entropy Alloy Design Toward Cobalt Substitution for High Hardness and Low Wear Rate Using X–Cr–Fe–Mn–Ni System2025
  4. 4Investigation Of Various Hardmetals With Novel High Entropy Alloy Binder2025
  5. 5Microstructure, Sliding Wear, and Electrochemical Corrosion of a High-Entropy Alloy–Cermet Composite Thermal Spray Coating2026