An edition reveals insights from a unique ostracon about Heraclius, suggesting historical significance.
On 21 November 1921, W. E. Crum wrote to H. I. Bell: ‘My dear Bell — Is this ostracon legible enough for you to improve my attempt at a reading? I’d be much obliged.’ There follows a transcription, with Bell’s corrections, and Crum continues: ‘It came presumably from D. el Bahri & has been lent me, with others — just too late for my book.’ A century later, the ostracon remains unpublished, and its current location is unknown; it does not seem likely that the original will be rediscovered soon. As it is something apparently unique, I thought it would be worth presenting an edition based on Crum’s transcript as revised by Bell.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikolaos Gonis (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: