Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Panel reveals practices and principles for advancing catalogues as data in digital humanities, suggesting vital interventions.
Catalogues are data. And as a precursor to a range of tasks – from using catalogues proxies for understanding the collections they describe to undertaking reparative cataloguing – it is important to get to know that data. This panel draws together practitioners, researchers, and creators of catalogues-as-data to report on novel work that stewards, develops, and advances catalogues-as-data in a range of digital humanities contexts. What will emerge are practices, principles, and prospects for future catalogues-as-data work that are grounded in DH Benelux’s unique interdisciplinary Digital Humanities community. At a time when there are ever fewer barriers to accessing both high-performance computation and machine approaches to computational analysis of catalogue data, we argue that the grounded and critical approaches to catalogues-as-data advanced by this panel are vital interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: