PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026The British Journal of Aesthetics0 citationsOpen Access

A Stone should not be Music: Abstract Artefacts and Social Practices

View Full Paper
DJDaehwi Jeong

Key Points

  • The aim is to critically evaluate the perspective that properties of abstract artworks, specifically music, are socially constructed rather than intrinsic.
  • Literature review of Friedell's theories (2020, 2025)
  • Analytical critique of intrinsic vs extrinsic properties
  • Assessment of case studies involving non-musical artefacts
  • Challenges the notion that musical properties are purely extrinsic
  • Illustrates examples where non-music can embody musical qualities
  • Highlights the impact of social conventions on the interpretation of abstract artworks

Abstract

Abstract In recent decades, the precise metaphysical nature of abstract artworks has become a contentious subject. Notably, according to Friedell (2020, 2025), properties traditionally deemed intrinsic to abstract artefacts are extrinsic. For instance, musical works are argued to have features such as sound structures, lyrics, rhythm, and the like only extrinsically. From this perspective, such musical properties are attributed to musical works through social conventions. In this article, I will critically examine Friedell’s view, particularly in the context of musical works. Specifically, this line of view cannot exclude non-music such as fictional characters or even a stone becoming music or other artworks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Daehwi Jeong (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8955f6c1944d70ce06676https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayaf058
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper