PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Economies1 citationsOpen Access

Asymmetric Effects of Oil Price Shocks on Stock Markets: A NARDL Analysis for Türkiye and Kazakhstan

View Full Paper
ÖİÖzkan İMAMOĞLU

Key Points

  • This research investigates how stock markets in Türkiye and Kazakhstan respond asymmetrically to oil price shocks from 2010 to 2025.
  • Analyzed stock market indices of Türkiye and Kazakhstan from 2010 to 2025.
  • Applied the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model to assess oil price impacts.
  • Evaluated exchange rate dynamics and oil price variations on market responses.
  • In Türkiye, stock markets were negatively influenced by rising oil prices and primarily driven by exchange rate changes.
  • Kazakhstan's market showed a strong vulnerability to falling oil prices at a significant level.
  • Higher error correction speed in Türkiye (28%) compared to Kazakhstan (4%) suggests more efficient market recovery.

Abstract

This study examines the asymmetric responses of stock market indices in Türkiye and Kazakhstan to oil price shocks during the 2010–2025 period. Using the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model, the study decomposes the nonlinear effects of oil price fluctuations on financial markets. Empirical findings reveal that in Türkiye, a net oil importer, the stock market exhibits a dual-sensitivity: while exchange rate dynamics (2.34) remain the dominant driver, oil price increases (−0.12) exert a direct and statistically significant negative pressure. In contrast, Kazakhstan, a net oil exporter, shows a high vulnerability to oil price decreases (−1.05) at the 1% significance level, confirming a strong asymmetric structure (p = 0.0122). Furthermore, the error correction speed is significantly higher in Türkiye (28%) than in Kazakhstan (4%), indicating divergent market efficiency and recovery mechanisms. These results demonstrate that financial market reactions to external shocks differ fundamentally based on energy trade structures. The findings suggest that oil-importing countries must prioritize exchange rate stability, while oil-exporting nations must develop specific policy buffers against the persistent downside risks of global energy cycles.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Özkan İMAMOĞLU (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8958f6c1944d70ce06921https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14040125
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper