This audit assesses LLM roles in cybersecurity, revealing their effectiveness in vulnerability analysis and incident response, indicating governance controls are needed for full autonomy.
This paper synthesizes publicly available evidence on the role of large language models (LLMs) in cybersecurity operations. Rather than proposing new benchmarks, the work audits existing research—including Mozilla advisories, peer-reviewed security studies, and regulatory standards—to assess which cybersecurity tasks are currently well-supported, weakly supported, or not supported for LLM deployment. The authors argue that current evidence supports LLM-assisted vulnerability analysis, penetration-testing workflows, and incident-response augmentation, but does not support claims of fully autonomous security operations without substantial governance controls. The paper contributes a machine-readable evidence matrix and task-level summary to enable independent verification of its claims.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Plajutin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: