Key result
NP-led care shows no quality of life benefit over cardiologist care but improves patient satisfaction.
Why the study?
Health system limitations can delay specialty cardiovascular care for AF, and whether nurse practitioner-led care improves quality of life compared to usual cardiologist care was unknown.
Does nurse practitioner-led care improve quality of life in adult patients with atrial fibrillation compared to usual cardiologist care?
RCT (n=150)
Does nurse practitioner-led care improve quality of life in adult patients with atrial fibrillation compared to usual cardiologist care?
Nurse practitioner-led care for atrial fibrillation provides similar quality of life and clinical outcomes as usual cardiologist care, while significantly improving patient satisfaction.
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare resource utilization.Health system limitations can result in delays to specialty cardiovascular (CV) care.Nurse practitioner (NP)-led care may improve access and quality of care.The purpose of this study was to assess effect of NP-led care compared to usual cardiologist care on quality of life in patients with AF.Methods: Patients with AF referred to a specialized cardiac clinic were randomized to NP-led or usual cardiologist care for 6 months.Primary outcome was difference in change in Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) scores at 6 months between groups.Secondary outcomes were difference in change of EuroQOL EQ-5D-3L scores at 6 months between groups, composite outcome of death from CV causes, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and patient satisfaction measured by the Consultant Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) at six months. Results:We enrolled 150 subjects, with 10% loss to follow up.Study subjects were 62% male, mean age 64 years, overall AFEQT baseline score 66.45+4:86.There were no significant baseline differences between groups.AFEQT scores, EQ-5D-3L and CV outcomes were not different at 6 months, NP-led care showed higher patient satisfaction in the CSQ domain of professional care (76.32 +11.32 vs 65.75+15.45,p=0.0006). Conclusion:We found no difference in quality of life or CV outcomes at 6 months with NP-led care vs usual cardiologist care.NP-led care resulted in higher patient satisfaction.Further research is needed to explore the effect of NP-led AF care in CV settings Clinical Trial Registration NCT02745236
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smigorowsky et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Atrial Fibrillation (n=150). Nurse practitioner-led care vs. Usual cardiologist care was evaluated on Difference in change in Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) scores at 6 months between groups. Nurse practitioner-led care showed no difference in quality of life compared to usual cardiologist care, but yielded higher patient satisfaction (CSQ score 76.32 vs 65.75, p=0.0006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: