Objectives We use new data and robust methods to estimate mortality levels and trends for US states and Washington DC and quantify cohort life expectancy for birth cohorts between 1941 and 2000. Design Observational retrospective cohort study. Data Mortality data and population estimates for cohorts born between 1941 and 2000 at the state, regional and national levels were obtained from the US Mortality Database. Main outcome measures We estimated cohort life expectancy at birth by sex and geographical level. We used the coefficient of variation to assess levels and trends in convergence in cohort life expectancy by geographical level. Results In contrast to recent findings, estimates suggest that all states and regions experienced cohort life expectancy gains between the birth cohorts of 1941 and 2000 for both sexes, typically more than 5 years; the range included gains of 7–8 years in Oklahoma and Arkansas to over 14 years in Arizona, New Mexico and South Carolina (men). States sharply converged in the 1940s due to the South making substantial gains in under-five mortality, and since the 1960s there has been overall stability in geographical variation that is a combination of continued convergence by the South and modest divergence in the Midwest. Conclusions Cohort life expectancy estimates across US states over the birth cohorts born between 1941 and 2000 have shown important gains in all states and regions. The lack of progress estimated in other work is not replicated; for example, recent work estimated that between 1950 and 2000, at least 15 states’ female populations experienced cohort life expectancy losses; however, the use of better data and robust methods show no losses by any state. Our results also point to early life public health and medical interventions as key explanations for regional convergence in cohort life expectancy around 1950, however, the results suggest only modest additional convergence since then.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Arolas et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895d86c1944d70ce06ff4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109623
Héctor Pifarré i Arolas
University of Wisconsin–Madison
José S. Andrade
Universidade Estadual do Ceará
Jason Fletcher
University of Wisconsin–Madison
BMJ Open
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...