PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Systems Research and Behavioral Science2 citationsOpen Access

Is Reading an Upstream Predictor of Science and Mathematics Achievements in PISA? A Bayesian Network Analysis for Policy Educational Interventions on Socio‐Economic Dispersion and Gender Gaps

View Full Paper
SOSimona‐Vasilica OpreaABAdela Bâra

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how reading affects science and mathematics achievement while considering socio-economic and gender gaps.
  • Analyzed PISA 2022 data across multiple countries.
  • Employed Bayesian network modeling with Peter–Clark and hill-climbing algorithms.
  • Conducted ANOVA analyses to complement Bayesian findings.
  • Simulated policy interventions using do-operator logic to address SES and gender gaps.
  • Identified a stable performance chain: Reading → Science → Math.
  • Found a direct influence of socio-economic dispersion on all subject performances.
  • No consistent direct causal effect of gender gaps on performance; only a sensitive link from GenderGap_Math to Mean_Science_2022.
  • SES equalization simulations led to unexpected reductions in high-performance probabilities.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the structural relationships among reading, science and mathematics performance, socio‐economic dispersion (SESVariance) and gender gaps using cross‐country PISA 2022 data. The primary objective is to assess whether reading functions as an upstream determinant of academic achievement and to evaluate the causal roles of SES and gender disparities within an integrated probabilistic framework. We employ Bayesian network (BN) modelling with both constraint‐based (Peter–Clark) and score‐based (hill‐climbing with BDeu score) algorithms under multiple discretization schemes, complemented by ANOVA analyses. Policy‐relevant interventions are simulated using do‐operator logic to examine SES and gender gap equalization scenarios. The BN also supports probabilistic queries that define performance archetypes. Robustness is assessed through alternative binning strategies and bootstrap stability analysis. The BN reveals a stable performance chain (Reading → Science → Math) and a direct influence of SESVariance on all subjects. Contrary to econometric associations, gender gaps exhibit no consistent direct causal effect on performance, except for a discretization‐sensitive link from GenderGapMath to MeanScience₂022 in 4‐bin models. SES equalization simulations produce counter‐intuitive reductions in high‐performance probabilities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oprea et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895ea6c1944d70ce07215https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.70055
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper