PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Production and Operations Management2 citations

EXPRESS: Navigating Traceability: How Pricing and Responsibility Sharing Impact Quality and Welfare

View Full Paper
LLLijian LuRWRuxian WangXZXinyi Zhou

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the impact of traceability on product quality and stakeholder welfare in supply chains, focusing on pricing power and responsibility allocation.
  • Developed a multi-agent game-theoretic model
  • Investigated the effects of traceability on product quality and welfare
  • Examined scenarios of buyer vs. supplier pricing
  • Traceability can enhance product quality but depends on pricing structures
  • Under buyer pricing, traceability improves quality and benefits buyers when quality improvements are cost-efficient
  • Under supplier pricing, traceability always benefits suppliers, improving quality only under specific conditions

Abstract

As consumer demand for transparency and accountability in product sourcing grows, traceability-enabled technologies are increasingly adopted across supply chains. This paper explores the diverse impacts of traceability on product quality and supply chain welfare, particularly on pricing and responsibility sharing among stakeholders. We develop a multi-agent game-theoretic model to investigate how effective traceability systems are in enhancing product quality and supply chain members’ welfare.We find that traceability operates as a double-edged sword: it does not always improve quality or benefit all parties, and its effectiveness depends critically on how pricing power and responsibility for quality failures are allocated between the buyer and suppliers. Under buyer pricing, traceability raises quality and benefits the buyer when quality improvement is cost-efficient, whereas it benefits suppliers when quality improvement is costly. Under supplier pricing, traceability always benefits suppliers, but it improves quality only when responsibility is exogenously set or when quality improvement is cost-efficient, and it benefits the buyer only when responsibility is endogenously chosen or when quality improvement is cost-efficient. These findings provide important managerial implications for practitioners and offer guidance for policymakers and firms in designing traceability systems that enhance product quality and overall supply chain welfare.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d896166c1944d70ce07593https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478261443754
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Technology-Enabled Traceability and Sustainable Governance: An Evolutionary Game Perspective on Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration2025
  2. 2Dynamic game research of food agricultural products supply chain based on blockchain traceability technology2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Pricing Strategy and Coordination of Agricultural Product Supply Chain Considering Traceability Level and Online Evaluation2025
  4. 4Research on dynamic pricing and coordination of fresh produce supply chain based on differential game considering traceability goodwill2024 · 5 citations
  5. 5The impact of traceability information on consumer purchase behavior in e-commerce platforms2026