PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Advanced Theory and Simulations2 citations

Density Functional Theory Insights Into Seawater Splitting: Current Progress and Future Perspectives for Catalyst Design

View Full Paper
MRMeena RittiruamWalailak UniversityAPAllan Abraham PadamaUniversity of the Philippines Los BañosWDWilson Agerico DiñoOsaka Gakuin University

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how density functional theory (DFT) aids in developing catalysts for efficient seawater splitting.
  • Review of DFT-based research on seawater splitting
  • Analysis of Gibbs free energy for reaction mechanisms
  • Examination of electronic properties including density of states and charge distribution
  • Identification of gaps in current modeling approaches
  • Clarified mechanisms of oxygen and chlorine evolution reactions
  • Identified issues like corrosion and scaling that hinder catalyst performance
  • Outlined missing elements in current DFT models, such as solvation effects
  • Proposed future directions for enhancing catalyst stability and efficiency

Abstract

ABSTRACT Hydrogen generation from seawater splitting has attracted increasing attention as a sustainable approach to achieve large‐scale, carbon‐neutral energy conversion while alleviating freshwater scarcity. However, the presence of chloride and other ions introduces side reactions, corrosion, and scaling that hinder catalytic performance and stability. In recent years, density functional theory (DFT) has become a key tool for understanding these challenges and guiding the rational design of efficient and durable catalysts. This review provides a comprehensive overview of DFT‐based research on seawater splitting, including statistical trends, representative findings, and emerging theoretical directions. Most DFT studies focus on Gibbs free energy analyses for oxygen, hydrogen, and chlorine evolution reactions, while others explore electronic properties such as density of states, d‐band center, and charge distribution. Theoretical results have clarified mechanisms underlying OER selectivity, Cl‐evolution‐reaction suppression, and corrosion resistance, complementing experimental insights. Finally, the review identifies major gaps in current modeling approaches, such as the lack of explicit solvent, dynamic stability, and ion effects, and outlines perspectives for integrating solvation and kinetics to enable rational catalyst design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rittiruam et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d896676c1944d70ce07cd0https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.70380
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nanostructured hydrotreating catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen evolution2014 · 2,431 citations
  2. 2Structural advantages and enhancement strategies of heterostructure water-splitting electrocatalysts2021 · 189 citations
  3. 3Mn Doping and P Vacancy Induced Fast Phase Reconstruction of FeP for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline Seawater2023 · 41 citations
  4. 4Biomimetic (Co, Ni, W)O N /WO3 photoelectrocatalyst for robust seawater oxidation2024 · 13 citations
  5. 5Controlling Selectivity in the Chlorine Evolution Reaction over RuO 2 ‐Based Catalysts2014 · 75 citations