PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences1 citations

SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV disrupt host protein synthesis via nsp1 with differential effects on the integrated stress response

View Full Paper
NPNicholas A. ParentiRCRenee CusicDRDavid M. Renner

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV utilize nsp1 to affect host protein synthesis and integrated stress response mechanisms.
  • Utilized recombinant SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV with nsp1 mutants.
  • Infected wildtype and knockout cell lines to assess translation and mRNA degradation.
  • Assessed the phosphorylation state of eIF2α and GADD34 expression.
  • SARS-CoV-2 mutants shut down translation in wildtype and PKR knockout cells, but not in PERK knockout cells.
  • MERS-CoV mutants rescued translation even in wildtype cells.
  • SARS-CoV-2 WT suppressed GADD34 expression, while MERS-CoV WT induced GADD34.

Abstract

Coronaviruses pose a serious threat to public health, driving the need for antiviral therapeutics and vaccines. Therefore, it is paramount to understand how this family of viruses evades cellular antiviral responses and establishes productive infection. The conserved coronavirus nonstructural protein 1 (nsp1) has been shown to inhibit host protein synthesis and, in some coronaviruses, promote host messenger RNA (mRNA) degradation while viral mRNAs are protected. We showed previously that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) induces activation of host integrated stress response (ISR) kinases protein kinase R (PKR) and PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), which promote phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2α) and consequent inhibition of host protein synthesis. In contrast, eIF2α remains unphosphorylated during Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection. To investigate the interactions of nsp1 and the ISR kinases, we utilized recombinant SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV expressing nsp1 with mutations in each of two conserved domains. Upon infection with SARS-CoV-2 nsp1 mutants, translation was shut down in wildtype (WT) and PKR knockout (KO) cells but rescued in PERK KO cells, likely due to reduced p-eIF2α. In contrast, translation was rescued during infection with the analogous MERS-CoV nsp1 mutants even in WT cells. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 WT suppressed expression of GADD34, a negative regulator of eIF2α phosphorylation, while SARS-CoV-2 nsp1 mutants induced GADD34. In contrast, MERS-CoV WT induced GADD34. Utilizing single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization, we found that SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV nsp1 promote host mRNA degradation during WT, but not nsp1 mutant, infection. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV differ in interactions with the ISR and nsp1 control of host protein synthesis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Parenti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d896a46c1944d70ce083d2https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2536296123
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper